• Register
  • Login
 

Hijinks Inc.

Google doesn't have a tagline, why should we?
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Repo
  • About

Recent comments

  • Aaron Nelsen on Hitman: Contracts Cheats (OS X)
  • Fred Smith on Hitman: Contracts Cheats (OS X)
  • Fred Smith on Top posts for the week
  • Dave Sack on Top posts for the week
  • Aaron Nelsen on Top posts for the week
  • Recent posts

    • No, I Am Iron Man! [The Late (Second) Opinion]
    • Hitman: Contracts Cheats (OS X)
    • Terminal Tips: Part 1
    • The poor man's touch pad
    • 3G iPhone as early as tomorrow?

    Vista Vs. XP

    Author: Aaron Nelsen - 6:15 am

    5 May

    I’ve often wondered just how bad Vista really is on system performance, so recently when I purchased a couple of Acer laptops I decided to install XP on one and leave Vista on the other for a few tests. Basically I’m just running Geekbench and a battery life test, nothing crazy.

    For the battery test, I merely pointed the browser to a URL set to auto refresh every 30 seconds and disabled all power saving features.

    Both computers are the follwing:
    Model:
    Acer Aspire 4715Z
    Processor: 1.73GHz Pentium Dual Core
    RAM: 2GB RAM

    [ Vista ]
    First, I ran Geekbench. The system scored a moderate 1911, but of course the system shipped with a bunch of bloatware, so in the interest of fairness I removed all the pre-installed software and ran Geekbench again, it then scored 1922.

    The battery life gave out after 1 hour and 45 minutes of doing nothing but browsing the internet, that’s pretty sad.
    [ XP ]
    Running Geekbench on XP with no drivers installed, resulted in a score of 1939, only slightly higher than the Vista machine.

    After installing all the drivers and re-running Geekbench I ended up with a much more statisfying score of 2168. Not as large of a difference as I expected, but still a noticeable improvement.

    The battery life saw a huge jump though, ending with 3 hours and 14 minutes while browsing the internet.

  • 2 Comments
  • Filed under: Acer, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Aaron Nelsen, Technology
  • Samsung Q1 Ultra

    Author: Aaron Nelsen - 6:30 am

    29 Apr

    I’ve been going back and forth and whether or not I should buy a UMPC. Now one could argue that I don’t need one, and they’d be right… but I can dream!

    If I did buy one, I think I’d go with the Samsung Q1U-V. The base specs are decent for a UMPC (especially for its price of $799)… Intel Processor A110(800MHz), 7″ WSVGA screen, 1GB DDR2 400 RAM, 60GB 4200rpm hard drive, Intel GMA950 graphics card, and Windows Vista Home Premium (which I would replace with Windows XP Tablet Edition). Full specs are located after the jump.

    Samsung Q1 Ultra

    In the end I opted not to purchase one, mainly because between my laptop and my iPhone I already have enough gadgets to cover my computing needs. Though I might reconsider getting a UMPC if the HTC Shift drops in price drastically.

    Read the rest of this entry »

  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: UMPC, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Aaron Nelsen
  • How I feel about Vista

    Author: Aaron Nelsen - 2:55 am

    15 Jan

    Windows Vista

    Sign the petition to save Windows XP!

  • 1 Comment
  • Filed under: Windows Vista, Aaron Nelsen, Microsoft

  • Archives

    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007

    RSS Feeds

    • Entries (RSS)
    • Comments (RSS)

    Hijinks Inc. developed by Aaron Nelsen